I want to start this post by stating that I gain nothing from defending Andy Garakhani or Jessica Patterson. They both hate my guts. I get reminded of this repeatedly by people in all walks of politics. However, your intrepid blogger prefers to deal with as many facts as possible, even when defending people who hate me.
Steve Frank has written at least two of his columns post-convention, and they are riddled with falsehoods. If the opposition to the McCarthy-Patterson GOP is to be effective, the truth needs to be the focus.

Just stop, Steve
Several months ago, CRP Chair Jessica Patterson appointed the CRP Resolutions—every member was appointed by her. Their votes represent HER views. On September 30, 2023, the CRP Resolutions voted NO to recommend HR 26 and HCR 3 to the full body. Below are these measures.
Steve wrote the above line to create the false impression that the Resolutions Committee are all robots that do what they are told by Jessica Patterson. This is a lie, similar to all the committees – of course, the chair is going to think through the appointments and will favor loyalists… but assuming she can control all the committees post-appointment is absurd.
For years, the Resolutions Committee has killed almost all resolutions submitted by the opposition. This convention was no different, but Steve Frank’s deception is an attempt to say the Resolutions Committee did business as usual, but this time is special because it means that Jessica Patterson was bought by Planned Parenthood. Jessica is many things, while she runs from the Abortion Issue like most squishes, from there, Steve Frank departs from reality.
When Jim Brulte was CAGOP Chair, he ensured the opposition was taken care of. Not all CAGOP Chairs are this magnanimous. Expecting and demanding fair treatment from people you lie about is completely ludicrous.
Why did Jessica Patterson give no direction from the Dias about the platform versus telling people she was voting no on the Resolution? The leadership of the CAGOP kills resolutions as a rule. When chair of the committee, Robert Philibozian has always been known as the killer of resolutions. So this is nothing new, and the hysteria of it suddenly meaning Jessica Patterson is now trafficking in body parts etc. etc. etc. is as absurd as a Walmart toupee.
However, the Platform was a completely different issue.
The Log Cabin Republicans were leading the drill to shred the platform. Every insider I know 100% told me this. There was no Andy Gimmecandy, David Stafford Reade, Scott Winn et. al. leading some effort to harvest proxies to kill the platform. Think it through. The enemies of Andy and Jessica are the Conservative opposition, but not every conservative. This means that equal numbers of people on both sides of the platform issue were supporters of the current regime. Think: Paula Whitsell and Fred Whitaker for example, both are Conservative supporters of Patterson.
If you are Andy and Jessica, you are pinned and can’t take a position. The Log Cabin are huge supporters of Jessica. The CRA and others are sworn enemies. One of the critical defects of character borne by most in the political world is if you cross them once, you are on the s–t list forever. Trump, McClintock, Jessica, Andy, David and others all have this defect of character. Jessica Patterson was NEVER going to side with the CRA on anything. Just accept this and drive on.
All the prior statements do not exempt the leadership of the Log Cabin Republicans from accountability over breaking their promise regarding not attempting to change the platform.
California’s Highest Ranking Republican Ted Gaines is a hero of the fight to keep the platform. I forgot to mention him in my first write up. Unlike McClintock, Ted Gaines pushed hard for Conservative Values despite McClintock trying to convince him to stand down. McClintock’s betrayal of Conservatives (which he has done many times over the years) is worse than any meaningless resolution that got killed on the Convention Floor. FYI – Steve Frank hates Tom McClintock too dating back to when McClintock beat him for Assembly in 1996.
Andy Gimmecandy was not paid to stack the Platform Drafting Committee with liberals. Steve Frank asserted he was. Had I gotten any proof Gimmecandy and Jessica Patterson were running or part of an organized effort to eviscerate the platform, I’d have come out with the allegations including proof. You have none and you get none from Steve Frank. Trust me, your intrepid blogger talked to a ton of people.
Don’t forget Jessica Patterson’s staff called the FBI on your intrepid blogger and some still wish the Federales would have hauled me off to jail. There is nothing in it for me to cover for them at all.
What is Andy G. guilty of? He does indeed believe the social issues cost us elections and would like to see them go away. He is wrong for that belief, but that is much different than making thousands of dollars trying to rig a proxy drill to make that happen.
It is the opinion of your intrepid blogger that Steve Frank hates LAGOP Chair Tim O’Reilly. O’Reilly is a decent man who deserves better than the dehumanization he has suffered at the hands of Steve Frank and crew. O’Reilly is a squish but that does not make someone eligible for the death penalty or libel. You read Steve Frank’s writings about him and you could draw no other conclusion. I have never met Tim O’Reilly, I have seen him on tape and read some of his emails and there is a palpable difference between he and Steve Frank.
Even this part of Steve Frank’s column is only partly true because Mr. Frank can’t help himself:
But with the threat from Legislators, a distracted Andy Gimmekandy failed to manufacture the votes Tim needed to win like he had done previously for Tim’s ascension to Los Angeles County Chairman. David Hernandez, a real conservative Republican, won election to a seat held for years by Jessica’s rubber stamp, 68 to 61. To add insult to injury for Jessica, a long-time grassroots activist, Jon Paul White, won the Associate Representatives position on the Executive Committee, 61 to 55.
The legislators never had to threaten Andy Gimmecandy! Since Steve wrote that he decimated the meaning of the true part of the paragraph. It is clear to anyone observing that Andy was not invested in this convention proxy drill and left the door open to opposition victories. But, the opposition can still only win certain issues in controlled universes.
Please note that David Hernandez is very close to Steve Frank and has been for years. Also, John Paul White was expelled from CRA Leadership for being a disruptive force. Welcome them both to the CAGOP Board of Directors. (P.S. had I had a vote, I’d have voted for both of them over their opponents)
I will finish this by saying Harmeet Dhillon was also a hero of the platform drill. She has been a consistent force within CAGOP politics. Before the convention, She advocated for leaving the RNC Delegate Rules mostly intact. For this, despite her years of service to Donald Trump and crew, she was singled out by Trump in his expletive-laced speech to the CAGOP on Friday. Similar to the opposition of the CAGOP that can’t seem to be consistent and demand 100% agreement, so also did Harmeet experience the same from the former President. Yet, all the same she played another pivotal role in defending our platform. She deserves our continued support.

Steve Frank needs to retire. For example, he can’t even spell Corrin Rankin’s name right when he lies about her. If the opposition to the CAGOP’s ruling junta is so worried about who the next officers are going to be, maybe it is high time we all stop following proven liars and fight the squishes with some truth. The impressionable delegates that can be swung will respond to that.
Please see the two posts of Steve Frank I referenced here and here for attribution purposes.

lol, wow…this is funny. OMG, this stuff is hilarious!
Let me quote some points from here:
1) “Steve Frank has written at least two of his columns post-convention, and they are riddled with falsehoods.”
2) “Steve wrote the above line to create the false impression that the Resolutions Committee are all robots that do what they are told by Jessica Patterson. This is a lie, ..”
3) “Had I gotten any proof Gimmecandy and Jessica Patterson were running or part of an organized effort to eviscerate the platform, I’d have come out with the allegations including proof. You have none and you get none from Steve Frank. Trust me, your intrepid blogger talked to a ton of people.”
4) “Steve Frank needs to retire.”
lol, oooooooooo, (stops laughing) This is priceless. I would imagine, the blogger gets a PASS, due to his time in the political world; his ‘credibility’; his infinite knowledge of the inside; it’s his blog.
Point four, is what is commonly known as, calling someone out. WHO, supposedly, is a “friendly to the Repubs”.
All I did, was to ASK for a Debate, with this so called, legend. And I got my ass handed to me over it. I’ll withhold the comments over this, but you get the point.
Wow..lol. A debate with Mr Franks, still stands. With his expertise, he could school me very well, on what to expect, how to perform and what to know. Definately would be worth it! This?? Wow…………granted, it’s only one side of the story, but it’s a pretty hard hit of a story.
Ah well…………have to wait and see how it all plays out.
I love the comments on the previous post.
Was this bait?
“For this, despite her years of service to Donald Trump and crew, she was singled out by Trump in his expletive-laced speech to the CAGOP on Friday. Similar to the opposition of the CAGOP that can’t seem to be consistent and demand 100% agreement, so also did Harmeet experience the same from the former President.”
I heard him “single her out” to pursue very real deception and corruption about WATER management in California. Sounded like a solid green light to bring a lawsuit or similar complaint. If he singled her out in a bad way, I missed it.
If expletives bother you in today’s real fight for survival in America, then I would suggest you lack fortitude, and need to vacate the playing field Not even sure what words are being referred to as “expletives” to be honest.
Where/when did Harmeet claim she was done wrong by Trump?Who wouldn’t demand 100% loyalty after having EVERY aspect of his life lied about and being stabbed in the back by supposed “supporters”. Did I miss it?
Trump is a long way from being similar to the “opposition to the CAGOP”-whatever that is. In fact, blogger provides no real examples of this claim and it kind of smells like a CNN/MSNBC talking point(lie).
Remember Doug La Malfa endorsing Trump in 2016 when it was considered political suicide or are we all just goldfish with short memories and a sadistic desire to divide the American people at every chance? He’s still in office and very much alive BTW. Who did he endorse in 2020? How did he vote in the impeachment trials and the censoring of Trump’s tweets? Doug has never waivered and his constituents are well aware of it and are staunchly supportive of him.
My impression of Trump calling out Harmeet’s name was that he did it in a positive way, indicating recognition of her.
I’m glad that you guys think that it was in a positive way, because I watched a tape I didn’t feel that way.
Aaron, you are demonstrating why you are marginal character in Placer County Politics – the first time we have a disagreement you’re going practically psycho calling me a Rino. That reflects on you.
The way that Trump has a grasp on you really demonstrates the stereotype of Trump supporters being cult members. As soon as I said, something you disagreed with with regards to Trump, you’ve basically gone berserk.
@sfgirl – that’s great news. Makes me feel a lot better about it.
munch munch munch
(eating popcorn)
Charlie? Want some?
munch munch munch
Clarification:
I am grateful that Aaron Park writes this blog. I am grateful that he allows comments. I will defend Aaron F. Park’s right to his own opinion. I was not referring to Aaron F. Park with my RINO comment-re-read if necessary. Aaron F. Park is doing a great service to the citizens of this state.
Defending Trump is patriotic.
lol, So Aaron Melody,
If you were not referring to Aaron F Park as a Rino with your comment, who WERE you referring it to? (I reread the post, seems to be F Park to me, but I digress)
I smell a bit of sarcasm in your retort, but that’s just me. MAYBE, I should be more accepting of the apology you wrote about calling F Parks a Rino on his own blog.
(smells like sarcasm to me nonetheless)
Defending Trump?… Is, patriotic? Soooooooo, your trying to say (without outright calling people out by NOT saying it openly) that for those who do NOT support Trump, that they are NOT patriotic? If they’re NOT patriots, then what exactly are you inferring towards them? Wow. You must be a hoot in person. Maybe one day, we can meet and you can (as LImbaugh used to say) SPLAIN yourself and your evident fever of patriotic zeal as to WHY only defending Trump is, a patriotic trait. Cause I’m at a loss here on this one.
QQing at F Parks. So, you’re not a patriot now. Hmmmm. Does anyone else know this about you? (being truthfully sarcastic here)
At Aaron M – thanks for the clarification.
Leo, now how did I get dragged into this one? Popcorn you say? (Laugh) I know both Steve Frank and Aaron Park well. They both have their views. Somethings it’s just how you ‘spin the facts’. Personally, I think we should just adopt the national party platform and stop all this foolish infighting in the future. The Democrats are the enemy…not fellow Republicans.
Hear Hear!!!
(raising cherry flavored Slurpee in the air!)