Pete Hardin BOMBSHELL, Woman Comes Forward to Corroborate the Memos – She Talked to the OC Media Who Refused to Run Stories

by | May 2, 2022 | 2022 Elections, OCDA Race, Pete Hardin | 1 comment

You see, with the Orange County Media, they will run unvetted information against Republicans, but deny anonymity to witnesses against Democrats. Only after the OC Register, LA Times and others talked to the confidential informant and demanded she come out in the open, did your intrepid blogger talk to the victim. Right On Daily is allowing her to stay protected from reprisal because we protect women at Right on Daily regardless of the political underpinnings.

Her story is broken here on the Right on Daily Blog as we continue to do the job of the corrupt local media for them.

Amongst other things

Let’s recap the Pete Hardin aka hardon chronicles for context.

If you recall our five-part series where we humiliated the local media who still had to disclaim their weak stories about Pete Hardin, the significance of this witness the media is ignoring is the very memo they are minimizing has been corroborated by this woman who has come forward.

The entire memo is linked here for reference: CONTINI MEMO

What did the victim have to say? Here is her sworn testimony.

She came forward because of an article in the Voice of OC. 

She indicated she had been charged with a crime and a bit over a year later – all charges were dropped.

Right as the victim was leaving court post dismissal, Pete Hardin started hitting on her.

Hardin later started instant messaging her on Social Media.

No wonder why the local media wants to force her to identify herself publicly, they know she will be afraid to and will also be afraid of the public scrutiny. It is very common for victims of sexual misconduct to be shamed and to feel shame. The local media are contributing to this.

So let’s recap the evolving Pete Hardin lie-fest, that has been enabled by the local media who only report the truth when humiliated into it:

Pete Hardin lied about being forced out of the military for sexual misconduct.

While Hardin admitted he was ultimately discharged for inappropriate sexual misconduct, he told the Orange County Register he did not resign to escape criminal prosecution, stating: “I did not resign in lieu of a court-martial.”

But according to Hardin’s former supervisors at the OCDA’s office: “[Hardin] was upfront [during his background check] that he left the military, at least in part, due to possible criminal prosecution for adultery.”

WHOOPS – where is the headline about this? 

Then Pete Hardin lied about his knowledge of a memo detailing his problems with sexual misconduct at the OCDA’s office. Hardon has been crucified over this lie and will continue to be until he is destroyed. 

Remember when Pete Hardin was initially asked about the memo during an interview with Voice of OC on February 25, similar to his idol Bill Clinton, “I was never told about this memo or these allegations.” Hardin did not have sexual relations with that Gerbil, I guess.

But according to a report on March 8, former Senior Assistant DA Jaime Coulter told the Voice of OC: The contents of that memo were discussed with [Hardin] personally, face to face. I was present in the room.”

 WHOOPS! Even Ron Jeremy got prosecuted for rape! 

Pete Hardin lied about being confronted by his supervisors at the OCDA’s office over his sexual misconduct.

When the Voice of OC asked Hardin about Coulter’s account of the meeting, which flatly contradicted his own, Hardin continued to falsely claim the meeting never took place: “I would not forget being confronted with allegations.”

But on March 9, one day later, The troubled predator Pete Hardin acknowledged that the meeting did acknowledged that the meeting did in fact, take place: “Ultimately, Ms. Contini and Mr. Coulter did what they’re supposed to do as managers whether these anonymous accusations were truth or fiction, and I applaud them.”

Your intrepid blogger had been all over Hardon for weeks, culminating with this post on March 11 because the Voice of OC finally begrudgingly wrote a story about the memos. Now, there is corroboration that the media is ignoring. 

Pete Hardin lied about being exonerated for sexual misconduct allegations. He ran like a little beyoch to avoid accountability. 

Now that Hardin has been forced to admit he was confronted by supervisors about his sexual misconduct (after initially lying repeatedly), he is falsely claiming that he was he was exonerated: “the investigation into these anonymous allegations didn’t corroborate a single accusation and disproved the most lofty claims.”

But the memo about Hardin’s behavior states: “[There is] a pattern that appears to be developing that is clearly cause for concern.”

And according to Coulter, when Hardin was confronted directly about the allegations in the memo and had an opportunity to deny them: “[Hardin] did not contest the allegations. He listened to the information and gave the appearance of being contrite.”

Imagine what would have happened had the DA’s office not done the half-measures that they did. How many more victims are out there?

Once nailed to the wall and exposed Pete Hardin lied about the reason he resigned from the OCDA’s office.

Hardin told the Voice of OC he resigned from the OCDA’s office to take a prestigious job at the US Attorney’s Office.

But according to Hardin’s former supervisor, Hardin took vacation time shortly after he was confronted about the sexual misconduct allegations (none of which he denied at the time), then immediately resigned: [Hardin] was counseled pursuant to the memo. And then…he left shortly after that. Left the DA’s office.

And according to the US Attorney’s website, the prestigious job Hardin left for (Special Assistant United State Attorney), was actually nothing more than an unpaid internship.

I wonder if Hardin was able to get laid while working as an unpaid intern?

That’s five lies to the local media and counting, but hey, there is an election to influence, right?

To be continued while we wait once again for the local media to do their job…

1 Comment

  1. Its called an Article 134 of the UCMJ (Uiniform Code of Military Justice) and applies to all branches of the military. It applies as follows and can result in a Court Martial. …”Adultery and Article 134 of the UCMJ: Elements
    (1) That the accused wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a certain person;

    (2) That, at the time, the accused or the other person was married to someone else; and

    (3) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.”

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Important Sites

You May Also Like

Get RightOnDaily straight to your inbox: