Anyone who has been in politics for any length of time knows politics is an ego game. When you add buckets of big donor money, you get a frustratingly bizarre metric that people outside struggle to understand.
I’ve also watched a simultaneous social media driven degradation of volunteer politics to the point where it has been rendered useless and ineffective.
This is why you need to look below the surface of what happened yesterday and the news reports to understand the underlying meaning of what happened.
The Media only reported there were 10 (out of 25) votes to “Vacate the Chair”. What they did not report is that there were as many as 8 Abstentions (some say 2). Other outlets reported 11-14. AS we get more information, the media did not even report the motion correctly, it was a motion to CONSIDER Vacating or hold the election later. Hold the election later carried. This is clear evidence that liberal media supports Chad Mayes.
The motion to vacate requires an “absolute majority” of 13 in order to carry. This means that an abstention is like voting no.
So, why abstain? It is to send a message that you do not support Chad Mayes for Assembly Minority Leader, yet oppose a “coup”. (Remember, this is their thinking, not mine)
Now do the math. No matter what there are more than 13 when you total up the Yes votes and abstentions.
There was no obligation to schedule a leadership vote for next Tue. If Chad Mayes was secure in his position, then they would have just driven on.
The question becomes, is it Jay Obernolte? Is it Melissa Melendez? Or will it be Vince Fong (who reportedly joined other Mayes opponents in abstaining)? Or will Chad think that the result of yesterday means he still has the votes to stay put?
The donors and “Third House” community reputedly love Chad Mayes and this metric was one of his strongest anchors to power. I’ve been told that repeatedly by several people and some of his hardest defenders tell me that the only function of a Permanent Minority Leader is raising money and Mayes does that well.
In the backdrop of this – Kings and Calaveras County Joined in the call for resignation. Also in the backdrop of all of this, the wishes of the party and grassroots seemed to be subordinated to the desire to maintain the sick dynamic of Sacramento. We’ve learned that the members of the legislature do not fear the county parties, the state party or the grassroots.
While it is clear to me that Mr. Mayes is done as Permanent Minority Leader next week, it is also clear to me that the Party itself is no longer effective.
I wrote a 5-post series entitled “Burning Down the California Republican Party”, it was a primer on effective leadership and grassroots organizing.
Feedback I received from deep inside the building indicated that the members received few, if any phone calls. The overwhelming majority of the communication was email, with still more via facebook. We may as well have been standing on street corners waiving campaign signs and attending a meaningless rally at the capitol.
While I am irritated at people like Phillip Chen and Kevin Kiley for reputedly abstaining rather than voting to vacate the chair (or whatever actual motion was made), after a night to sleep on it, I am not angry. I get it. I get their reasoning, and I understand the team failure that necessitated their decision in their mind. I personally would swing the sword (imagine that). I do believe that those two along with a few others will vote for leadership change next week.
Were the Grassroots more effective, we’d have toppled Chad Mayes outright last night and would not be in a position were we have to sustain an attack for another 7 days in order to ensure that Chad Mayes is not pulling another dirty trick. (deceptive tweets, lying to party officials, lying to constituents, shutting down official email accounts, bullying volunteers, throwing Melendez in the Dog House, running a drill to avoid leadership votes in caucus and the like…)
Think it through folks. If we don’t learn a lesson for ourselves (aka us little people) out of this mess, we will succeed in de-throning Chad Mayes, but will be in the same morass that we were in before our ineffectiveness and their lack of fear of us contributed to their decision to run Cap and Trade in the first place.

It is not as simple as the dethroning of Mayes. What we are seeing is the result of years of the degradation of the California party. Registration is at an all time low. Activism is for all practical purposes non existent.
The fact is that should there be a dethroning, and even if some Members are primaried (advantage to the Dems when we fight) nothing significant will change within the party nor in the legislature.
The prospects for adding a seat or two in the 2018s today appears iffy at best.
So the words ‘apathy’ and ‘entropy’ appear to be the most operative. And as depressing as that is there are two bright spots:
1. The whacko left may create bigger problems for the left and actually drive voters to the GOP
2. The Founders established states as their own experiments and to set examples for other states. They never said good examples. California can serve the country, perhaps best, by continuing to set a bad example.
My question is – How did our local Republican Representatives Vote? D-1 – Brian Dahle, D-3 – James Gallagher, D-5 – Frank Bigelow, D-6 – Kevin Kiley. Hopefully, they presented a united front by voting to remove Chad Mayes. If not, maybe the defectors need to be removed and replaced by a real Republican next year.
Bruce:
Dahle and Gallagher are fence-sitters. It is possible they roll off of Chad to someone else but they have been loyal to Chad for the duration.
Kiley abstained and is indeed not in the Chad Camp.
Bigelow is a 100% hard-core Chad ally and part of his leadership Crew.
I am very disappointed in Dahle and Gallagher, especially. I thought he was a true Republican conservative. But he has let me down on a couple of different instances during the past year. I had more faith in him and he is not staying true to his values. He’s taking the right stuff but not doing the right thing. Very disappointing! Don’t know that much about Dahle, not fond of his chief of staff though. I won’t mention any names.