Well, well, well – some “anonymous” commenter who is likely the man himself left a couple of priceless comments.
They seek to justify the drug dealing nephew and the $18k judgement that REMAINS UNPAID!
What a bunch of BS…. Just because someone you are related too, or even housing someone who has a drug problem does not mean Rene is unfit to do his job.
Obviously he is attempting to help a family member, it does not mean he condones that life style. As a matter of fact, just because he has first hand knowledge and has been around people with problems, makes him more capable of being a better leader, supported, helper, etc., as he can relate to others that have problems too. I bet almost everyone in Politics, schools boards, etc., all have family members who have or had drinking and/or drug problems within there life time. Get real people!! And Homeless people help too, and just b/c Rene may try to assist them in steering them towards avenues of support does not mean he or they are leeching off the system… And who’s business is it, on WHO lives at Rene’s house..or who pays the rent… GEEESH.. find something better to write about, versus slamming people who actually care about California, Roseville and the residents. Why don’t you post this!!
Rene Aguilera is on a school board and was harboring a known drug dealer in his house (until he moved him next door). There is no spinning that. Note – I left the typo and emboldened the choice lines in the comments left.
Such hear say. Just b/c he houses his nephew and his nephew has been picked up for drug paraphernalia, and has admitted to drug problems, DOES NOT mean he sells it out of his Rene’s house. Do you really think he and/or anyone would condone someone selling drugs out of his house.. You saying saying he is an accessory since his nephew has had charges in the past and/or b/c he uses drugs, that Rene is an accessory. Everything you are posting is LIBEL and hearsay. Just b/c Renene got a mortgage and hasn’t paid it, does NOT mean he ripped them off and/or any bad intentions when he got the loan. You do not know his financial situation. Like you said, he listed no income, no assets, so how can he repay the loan? So its not stealing, as when he got the mortgage or loan I am sure he had every intention to repay it. He has fallen on hard times and WHO are you to judge? What a joke you are.
I did not know that the unpaid judgement was a mortgage. Maybe the lienholder will foreclose and help clean up the neighborhood? Also note the standard democrat line of “I meant well”… as in I meant to pay it back. (and then didn’t) What kind of fiscal responsibility does that show the Children of the RJUHSD???
In order to get a judgement and a charge-off, it means that Mr. Aggie-Lair-Uh has ignored repeated attempts to communicate and/or has made no attempt to make arrangements to pay back the money. Of course Aggie-Lair-Uh knew this when leaving these anonymous comments.
Looks like we will need to re-start the meat grinder in 2016.