Pictured: A main teacher’s union boss that was also on the executive board of the DNC. She is also well-known for extreme left wing advocacy including a consistent war on parent’s rights and being a fixture at globalist type gatherings.
Every so often, Washington and the statehouses flirt with an old temptation: the belief that government knows better than parents.
And every so often, the American people remind them who’s actually in charge.
A new polling snapshot makes something unmistakably clear: voters overwhelmingly reject the idea that the state should coerce families when it comes to education. Only 15 percent of likely U.S. voters believe parents should face criminal prosecution for not sending their children to public schools. Seventy percent say absolutely not. The rest aren’t convinced either way — but the margin isn’t close.
That’s not a partisan quirk. That’s a cultural firewall.
The same pattern shows up elsewhere. Seventy percent of voters reject the idea that judges should have the authority to determine which educational method parents can use. And an even stronger 86 percent reject the premise that children are property of the state.
Read that again. Eighty-six percent.
In an era where nearly every issue fractures along party lines, parental authority appears to be one of the last bipartisan instincts left standing. Americans may argue about curriculum, standards, funding, or testing. But they draw a bright line when it comes to ownership. Children belong to families — not bureaucracies.
Yet the tension keeps resurfacing.
In Tennessee, home schooling advocates recently pushed back against legislative efforts that would have restricted parental flexibility. Similar debates have played out in other states under different labels — oversight, accountability, safety, equity. The language shifts. The impulse doesn’t.
The impulse is control.
The polling suggests voters aren’t buying it. Sixty-two percent approve of home schooling, with nearly a third saying they strongly approve. Only 28 percent disapprove. Ten percent aren’t sure — perhaps still weighing whether algebra is easier around the kitchen table.
But here’s the deeper message beneath the numbers: Americans don’t oppose public education. They oppose monopoly.
They don’t resent teachers. They resent mandates.
They don’t object to standards. They object to the assumption that the state’s judgment supersedes a parent’s.
For decades, public education operated under a social contract: communities fund schools, schools educate children, and parents retain the ultimate authority over their upbringing. The friction arises when that final clause is quietly downgraded.
When policy debates drift toward criminal penalties for parents who choose differently, voters recoil. When judges are positioned as arbiters of educational philosophy, voters resist. When rhetoric implies children are wards of the state rather than members of families, voters reject it outright.
And they reject it decisively.
This isn’t an anti-government uprising. It’s a pro-parent consensus. A reminder that pluralism — not uniformity — has always been the American model. Public school, private school, charter, home school — voters appear comfortable with choice, so long as the choice belongs to families.
The irony is that attempts to centralize authority often strengthen the very movements they aim to constrain. Every legislative overreach produces more advocates, more co-ops, more home-school networks, and more skepticism toward centralized control.
In the end, the numbers tell a simple story.
Americans trust parents more than they trust institutions when it comes to raising children.
And when government drifts toward coercion, voters don’t whisper their objections.
They answer with 70 percent

0 Comments