Oct 272020

What do you say to community leaders that support a deadbeat dad? That is how Scott Alvord and Karen Alvord elevated themselves from just another pair of Liberal Democrats to Scott Alvord being one of the main courses for the right on daily candidate chef school in 2020.

I knew Scott was a liberal democrat and was trying to present himself as a moderate – this is how most candidates that are in the minority in the area they are seeking election in do things.

The original plan was to hammer Scott for being a tax-and-spend liberal, supporting Abortion up until birth, and a host of other things. Then along came LaMills.

It was Karen Alvord publicly and forcefully pushing LaMills Garrett that raised alarm. It was well-known that Garrett had some issues. We’ve since learned they include admitting to sexual assaults, gun violence, fathering 3 children out of wedlock, not seeing his daughter until she was age 8 and then abusing the court system in the custody case just because he can. What kind of man refuses to go through a 30 minute mediation course with regard to the case of his own daughter?

Now, Scott Alvord has doubled down by finally coming out publicly in support of LaMills Garrett.

In the mean time – I started looking for answers with regard to Scott Alvord. They came fast and hard.

The information revealed that his resume was embellished at best and his personal situation was nowhere close to who he wanted people to believe he is.

Business Owner? Yes. Successful? It is easy to make a solid case that he is not.

Author? Yes. Has he sold books? Not many at all. Was he published? Investigation proves that he published his own book despite trying to obfuscate that fact. Worse, it appears that he created an author’s group on paper to give himself credibility.

Community Leader? It appears that Scott Alvord founded a paper non-profit as proven by our research.

Business professor? Try Adjunct Staff. Take a look at all of his expired paperwork and ask yourself if anyone should take his advice or business teachings seriously. But hey, we’ve been told by sources that you will be the proud owner of Scott’s new book if you take his class!

Ethical City Councilmember? We detailed 19-23 violations of Campaign Finance Law that we filed public complaints regarding. Mr. Alvord has even admitted to several of the violations. He’s taken personal credit for the work of others (such as City Staff when he blew the Amazon Hub rollout) and then blamed the same people for his own screw ups when caught!

I have not been surprised to see Alvord pleading his case in the comments section of this blog. Typically people living a lie are very thin-skinned and react to exposure, often in real time. What has also been disturbing, but not surprising is seeing Scott blame others for things clearly his fault. I expected to see him try to minimize and obfuscate – but blaming the current CFO of Placer Rescue Mission for issues whose genesis were under his tenure is beyond the pale. He also blamed city staff for his campaign finance maladies.

What happens when I deal with candidates that are hiding large closets of skeletons is the fact that people come forward. In the case of LaMills, everything I know about him as come from a few people that have come forward. LaMills has responded by calling me a racist, but similar to his hero Joe Biden’s response to the pay-for-play scandal with Ukraine, China and other countries – he has not denied a thing, just attacked the source. (Note, I’ve spoken to people that have known LaMills Garrett for many years – they have related that he screams racism to all who will listen and he even told a judge that his activism is the reason he has not gotten a job. I guess to explain the 7 months of Child support he is in arrears.)

Scott Alvord has threatened to sue me, while at the same time validating many things I have written thus undermining his own legal case. It is really hard when someone has woven an intricate web of lies to keep them straight – especially when unraveling them has been so easy. Given that Alvord has made so many amateur and basic mistakes I am also wondering about his skill set in general.

You’d think that if Alvord was truly loved and respected in the community that people would come out of the woodwork to defend him. Thus far, his defense has been leftist trolls on facebook using typical Saul Alinsky tactics that the left is now known for. Aside from a comment from a Staffer at WJU – I have had literally several people all of whom are public figures tell me to keep blasting Mr. Alvord.

It appears that Scott Alvord has alienated City Staff who can’t stand him. Nothing feels better than being gaslighted, used and minimized.

It appears that several local stakeholders are afraid of Scott Alvord as they perceive him to be vindictive and a bully. It is my opinion that they resent dealing with him on City Issues.

It appears that several people in local government that have to serve with him in various capacities disdain him and refer to him with terms like “fraud” and “Narcissist”.

What Mr. Alvord does not know is that I have a few stories from people I believe about Mr. Alvord that I have not told on this blog. They are disturbing and graphic. I did not know who Scott Alvord was, even Three Months ago. What an education it has been and if Scott is looking for someone else to blame (because he will never take responsibility for his own actions), he should blame his endorsement of LaMills Garrett for starting me on the path to discovery.

Do not vote for Scott Alvord under any circumstances, he is not qualified to hold office much less anywhere close to honest about who he is.

Stay Informed!

Sign up to receive RightOnDaily updates sent to your inbox.

  10 Responses to “Everything you do Matters. Why Our Expose’ on LaMills Garrett and Scott Alvord is Critical to the Future of Roseville”

  1. I mentioned earlier that I was taught to stand up against bullies. Yes, most people just shut up and take their beating. But I’m not one of those because I’m not the person you describe, and this is my home where I’ll retire, and I don’t want my friends and neighbors wondering how much of your stuff was true. 

     I know that people bash electeds all the time. Being a “politician” is not for the feint of heart. Yes, I was expecting the typical bashing that you give me: the extreme, “scary liberal” rhetoric. Amazingly, even most of what you say in those areas is untrue but it doesn’t matter because none of that junk pertains to how I serve. BTW, who in the world supports abortion up to birth? I guess I’ve never met someone like that, but I suppose someone who reads your blog will believe it. 

    In one of your early posts, when you shared a private text I sent you, I was backed into a corner so I told you exactly why I endorsed LaMills Garrett, and a lot had to do with why I wasn’t supporting his opponent due to his reputation that caused a 5-0 council vote not to renew him for another term on the Planning Commission. I was shocked to see his opponent then decide to run for City Council. But I supported Garrett because he served very well on the Charter Review Commission (I watched all the videos of those important meetings) and I knew him from RPAL. He did his homework, was really smart, had good ideas, and, honestly, we can use some diversity on the City Council. When the final votes come in, I’m willing to work beside either one. Both of them are good men. I think LaMills has a hell of a lawsuit opportunity against you. Good luck with that. 

    Your attacks about my “business success” was pretty low and because I work very hard for my clients, many of whom were struggling, it was a direct attack on my reputation, which I do not appreciate at all. 

    Your hangup about my books and whether they were self published or not was mostly entertaining, even though it was mostly false. But claiming that I force my students to buy my book, etc was, again, pretty low and untrue. 

    What the heck is your hangup about the correct title, “adjunct professor?” You have been so forceful on this issue that I actually went back to verify that I wasn’t mistaken. Guess what? Adjunct Professor is indeed the right title. Your buddy who works at WJU has the same title. 

    Your campaign violations are now up to 19-23? The number keeps growing. I think you messed up by not saying “alleged violations,” and that YOU were the one who filed the confusing claim, hopefully anyone reading this can figure out that it was in order to make these accusations. I’ve been in touch with both the FPPC and the City Clerk and almost everything was untrue, except for maybe some late filings in between the 2016 and 2020 elections. Hardly a scandal, but you only needed to make it look shady. 

    I own up to my faults, but your blog is not a fair or safe place to do so. You think it’s a sign of guilt, but I see it as standing up to dishonorable campaign tactics. 

    Your sources of information about how I treat people are pretty unreliable. I do know that only one elected has endorsed my opponent so far and we both know why, and if you compare it to the mostly-republican list who has endorsed me, there’s an interesting story in there. 

    But it’s easy to try to paint a picture of me being disrespectful to staff or stakeholders, because anyone who doesn’t know me would have no idea. But I hope people will get to know me better because disrespectful people can’t hide it very long. As electeds, we serve on multi-jurisdictional boards and committees and we get to know each other. Over time, it’s easy to pick out the disrespectful ones. Those who have supported my campaign explain why on my website. 

    You are getting paid to support Gary Johnson and Tracy Mendonsa. This is how you do that. 

    I’m not a perfect man and I certainly don’t pretend to be. My family and friends know I’m not perfect. But you’ve painted a carefully-crafted picture of someone I am not. You’ve mixed pure lies, suggestions, a few facts, annonymous comments, and lots of really bad overtones into something I don’t recognize. I’m not going to be silent and pretend it’s okay because it’s just politics. This isn’t just politics. It’s character assassination in front of mostly other electeds I serve with. You get to walk away after the election, but I have to live with damage you purposefully caused. 

  2. Me. Alvord,
    I do not know you and have not been paid for any of my comments. Yet, it is easy to surmise you are a fool. You endorsed Mr. Garrett without vetting him or you did and condone his behave, past and present because if you think he is no long a cheating, abusive, liar you are mistaken. Also, if you love your wife I would suggest keeping her far away from Mr. Garrett.

    Someone who know Mr. Garrett well.

  3. Councilman Scott Alvord thinks that exposing the truth is a “hangup”…

  4. Councilman Scott Alvord thinks that exposing the truth is a “hangup”…He diminishes his questionable behavior as somebody else’s “hangup”…Is it a mere “hangup” that citizens of Roseville have been, and still are, being led to believe that The Placer Rescue Mission is a bona fide, legitimate community non-profit?


  5. “Fred” (how brave of you), the PRM actually is a real nonprofit organization, led by some pretty passionate people. We had a board meeting two weeks ago and we’re deciding what to do with the organization. We might merge and we might dissolve…and we might buy some property. Our next board meeting will be interesting. If you think these are “huge red flags,” then hey, wave your flag. The PRM is not part of city politics.

  6. After reading rant after rant…Alvord should never be elected to any public officer…..He simply is to frigg’n stupid to hold office!

  7. He must have a lot of hang up when it comes to Lamills Garrett lol

  8. Scott,
    I will give you credit for responding and attempting to defend yourself. It tells me you believe what you have done is the right thing to do. However, I have never seen you defend your choice of Mr. Garrett. Furthermore, LaMills Garrett doesn’t even defend himself. I suppose it is because his behavior and character are indefensible.

  9. Amy. They are in defensible. I am the mother of his daughter whom he never met until she was 8. He is over $4k in arrears in child support right now and hasn’t been “caught up “ in over 4 years telling the state that he is unemployed. His website says he is a small business owner. Although I may believe his platform is the right one (I am a dem) I do not believe that a man who believes he is above the law (lying about employment status and/or ability to pay child support) should be an elected official. Obviously LaMills and I have our issues but that is not the debate here and now. The issue is how do we clean up the overall political mess this country is in. And I, as a staunch democrat bleeding liberal believe it starts here. In creating honest dialogue with people I don’t see eye to eye in on issues. But one thing I agree on is that we need to elect honest and moral political leaders to take us into 2021. Once LaMills cleans up his own house then I am on board but until then I will continue to do everything I can with the information I have to show Roseville that he is not an honest person who should be put in a position of power or leadership.

    Please note LaMills has hit me with a cease and desist order and even sent it as a bullying tactic to my place of employment (they shrugged it off and didn’t care). I’m sure he didn’t do his homework on CA’s Anti-SLAPP law. Nothing I have emailed or posted is untrue. He is trying to bully me into silence but he forgets that when a mama bear is cornered she defends her young to the death.

  10. Karen,
    I am sorry you and your daughter have had to deal with Mr. Garrett’s bizarre brand of cruelty.
    According to him, his wife forbid him from being the involved with his daughter as a condition of staying married to him. I personally find that hard to believe. After HP fired him I don’t believe he could get hired in tech, so he has tried to reinvent himself as a pilar of society. And it suits his vindictive nature to not pay support. This is not the behavior of a decent person but he has done a good job of fooling a lot of people in Roseville that he is the right man for the job. As for getting his house in order, that will never happen, at least not for long. He may fool another woman into making him appear to be a family man and honorable citizen but he will cheat, liar, use and abuser her until the facade crumbles. The cease and desist order shows that what you are doing is getting under his skin so good for you. I have tried to post things on Facebook and Twitter and he has them taken down and my accounts deactivated. I wish there was away to really let people know what he is truly like. I wish you and your daughter all the best (soon she will be old enough to decline visitation do hang in there).


 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>