Right On Daily Blog

Here is the original story linked here from Expresspros.com.

Among the Unemployed, Clinton Beat Trump 35%-25%; Did Not Vote is 34% (3% Johnson 1% Stein)

39% Say Trump Will Have a Positive Impact Creating Jobs; 35% Say Negative Impact 

58% Say It Would Be Easier to Find Work if there was Less Illegal Immigration

Majority Supports Repeal of Affordable Care Act

By a Small Margin, Preference is for Government Spending over Corporate Tax Cuts

Note the spending versus Tax Cuts Number was 52-48, meaning with education, that number could change easily.

Healthcare, Immigration and Tax Cuts

The unemployed were asked “Are you currently receiving health insurance as a result of the Affordable Care Act (ACA also referred to as Obamacare)?”

• 20 percent said yes
• 72 percent said no

Jobless Americans were asked to state whether they agree or disagree with various current policy issues:

I am in favor of repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA also referred to as Obamacare).

• Agree (net): 57 percent
  • Agree completely: 24 percent
  • Agree a lot: 9 percent
  • Agree somewhat: 14 percent
  • Agree a little: 10 percent
• Do not agree at all: 43 percent

It would be easier to get a job if there was less illegal immigration in the United States.

• Agree (net): 58 percent
  • Agree completely: 18 percent
  • Agree a lot: 12 percent
  • Agree somewhat: 13 percent
  • Agree a little: 15 percent
• Do not agree at all: 42 percent

While this poll has mixed numbers from this group in terms of weather they Trust Donald Trump to help them find a job – it shows that they “Get It” about Obamacare and Illegal Immigration and it’s direct effect on their lives.

This is something to think about.

Separately, take a look at this focus group of Pennsylvania Democrats.

CBS’ Face The Nation’s John Dickerson spoke with Pennsylvania voters, where they confirmed what the ABC News/Washington Post polls illuminated a coupled weeks ago: the Democratic Party is out of touch.

One voter, a lifelong Democrat, said that his party is not only out of touch, but they have zero interest in remedying the situation. They complain about how Putin and Wikileaks screwed them over (they didn’t), but added that what’s glossed over is that the Wikileaks document dumps showed how Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment were a bunch of liars. That’s really why liberals are upset; their dirty laundry was aired for all to see. Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Clinton’s primary opponent, would probably be the most infuriated, as it confirmed that senior staffers at the Democratic National Committee were actively trying to find ways to undermine the insurgent campaign.

Dickerson asked if there was one story that they’re sick and tired of hearing, which drew a response from a female voter, and it was the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

“We will go with Russia, okay? Because that was one of the things that is driving me absolutely mad. “I think Russia has already been proven to not have had any impact on our elections, they did not, you know, drive from polling place to polling place and, you know, hoodwink the machines and whatever,” she said. This woman also said that the obsessive nature Democrats have with this story makes them look desperate.

You’d think Quinnipiac – known as the Q-Poll would take a long, hard look at their sampling after 2016. However, it is clear that the Q-Poll has an agenda. This time, it is clear to create a false narrative about Trump and his approval ratings.

The poll claimed that Trump was underwater 36-58. It also claimed that the #1 word most associated with Trump was Idiot.

The Sample? 24% Republican, 34% Democrat, 35% Indie (2-1 Dem Lean), 8% other. Note that “Other” got 5.1% of the vote in 2016. The 2016 result was D +3.6 Turnout.

This sample assumes that less than 1/4 of the electorate is Republican and that the “Other” Category is 60% higher than it was just 6 months ago. By using left-leaning independents, which suggests that this sample would skew the result 12-15 points easily to the left.

Also note, they interviewed voters in Spanish and used REGISTERED voters. When you do Spanish calls and registered voters – both skew results to the left in addition.

Spanish-speaking voters (legal and illegal) favor democrats 8-1.

Registered Voter polls historically lean 2-3 points to the left, as the super low propensity voters tend to be poorer, more likely single and more likely to be on welfare than the rest of the electorate. By using registered voters, you are bringing people that are very unreliable and uninformed in the the polling sample that could also be influenced by the way the questions are asked.

It is my opinion that the motivation for this is to fool democrat donors in to giving money for losing races and an attempt to try to scare Republican donors off. This was consistent in 2016 when the polls were way off on the election.

Here are some examples of how poorly Quinnipiac did in 2016:

Quinnipiac said Donald Trump was going to lose North Carolina and Florida. They missed NC by 5.7, PA by 5.7 and Florida by 2.2. They underestimated Trump’s win in Ohio by 3.1.

Q-Poll had Clinton winning by as much as 14 in the summer.

Look no further than the democrats chasing an R+20 seat in Kansas. While they caught the feckless (now Congressman) flat-footed, they spent $2 million to lose. They actually believe these biased polls.

The democrats are now in to John Ossoff, a 30 year old staffer that lives with a Woman he is not married to in Georgia, a whopping $22 Million. Take a look at this ad from the Republicans highlighting the millions poured in to him by California donors.

The democrats are pouring money in to Montana. They are claiming that Rob Quist, a cowboy performer in nudist camps is within 6 Points of the Republican candidate to replace now Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke. Montana went for Trump by 20 points and has an at-large congressional district. (MT-AL is what they call it)

The media was bragging that the Omaha Mayor’s Race was going to be a referendum on Donald Trump – similar to all the other elections lost since Trump got inaugurated the Democrats spent a ton of money and lost. The Republican won by 7 points. Clinton won Omaha by 10. NE-02 went for Trump by 3.3 and famously was the first time a state split its’ electors in 2008 when Obama carried it.

Add to this, the democrats went in search of wins in Blue States in state level special elections. There were four failures as of March.

Only one seat has flipped. Won by a Republican.

Actual election results are telling the real story about Donald Trump’s effectiveness and popularity. Remember, the same media that is pushing the Russia did it Lie will carry rigged, fake polls forever.