Ron Paul has major issues – Neo-Nazis, Racists, etc.

 Ron Paul  Comments Off on Ron Paul has major issues – Neo-Nazis, Racists, etc.
Jan 162012
 

Check out some choice snippets about Ron Paul from his closest Supporters:

Jules Manson was a failed politician from Carson, Calif. Manson was also a big Paul supporter who would write, “I may be an athiest, but Ron Paul is my God,” on Paul’s website. Manson would also write, “Assassinate that n*gger and his family of monkeys,” of President Barack Obama.

This is not guilty by association. Ron Paul has spread white supremacy on conspiracy theories for years in his newsletters. The racism and conspiracy theories have driven some people to violence. Not only have Ron Paul’s racist supporters endorsed him and his views, he has endorsed them through his positions on the Civil War and the Civil Rights movement, without disavowing the support he gets from racists. This is guilt by racism.

Bill White is pictured here and here is his contribution to informing the world about Ron Paul:

Both Congressman Paul and his aides regularly meet with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review, and others at the Tara Thai restaurant in Arlington, Virginia, usually on Wednesdays. This is part of a dinner that was originally organized by Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis and Joe Sobran, and has since been mostly taken over by the Council of Conservative Citizens.

I have attended these dinners, seen Paul and his aides there, and been invited to his offices in Washington to discuss policy.
For his spokesman to call white racialism a “small ideology” and claim white activists are “wasting their money” trying to influence Paul is ridiculous. Paul is a white nationalist of the Stormfront type who has always kept his racial views and his views about world Judaism quiet because of his political position.

I don’t know that it is necessarily good for Paul to “expose” this. However, he really is someone with extensive ties to white nationalism and for him to deny that in the belief he will be more respectable by denying it is outrageous – and I hate seeing people in the press who denounce racialism merely because they think it is not fashionable.

Bill White, Commander
American National Socialist Workers Party

James Von Brunn was a white supremacist and anti-Semite who opened fired at the Holocaust museum, killing an African-American security guard. Von Brunn was an avid Paul supporter who posted a message on the Ron Paul Yahoo Group, saying, “HITLER’S WORST MISTAKE: HE DIDN’T GAS THE JEWS.” In 1983, Von Brunn was convicted of kidnapping members of the Federal Reserve Board, a common target of Paul’s, and was sentenced to six years in prison.Von Brunn died while awaiting sentencing for his crime.

Richard Poplawski is a neo-Nazi from Pittsburgh who regularly posted on the neo-Nazi website Stormfront. Poplawski would post videos of Ron Paul talking about FEMA camp conspiracy theories with Glenn Beck.

Polawski was afraid of a government conspiracy to take away people’s guns and wound up killing three police officers who came to his house after his mother made a domestic dispute call.

This should scare the hell out of you, if it doesn’t – you’re either asleep or praying that he is the nominee in order to help Barack Obama get re-elected.

I got most of my source data from here: News One For Black America. While this site is left-leaning, the post itself is amazingly objective and non-emotional in its’ content.

 

Dec 272011
 

I just recently looked at polling data – it shows that Ron Paul has little support amongst Republicans and in NH whose primary is open, most of Paul’s support is coming from Left-leaning Independents and Democrats.

I have a theory why – look at the host of articles about him.

Ex Aide says Ron Paul is a 9/11 Truther who thinks America should not have fought Hitler. This is the same guy that thought Saddam was justified in attacking Kuwait because Kuwait was “slant drilling” Iraqi Oil.

Former Aide – Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy is Sheer Lunacy.

Ron Paul on camera in 1987 talking about his racist newsletters.

As the libertarian candidate for President – he called Ronald Reagan’s administration a “dramatic failure”.

Ron Paul argues in favor of Congressional Earmarks in a 2009 LA Times article.

This is an article about an 8-page Ron Paul fundraising letter that was full of irresponsible comments – including forecasting a coming race war.

This is an article about Ron Paul’s support for HAMAS and his disdain for Israel.

Jack Dingess: “One of the Ron Paul Report newsletters claimed gays were going to donate blood en masse to infect the American blood supply with AIDS. The newsletters were written in the first person as if they were from Ron Paul. How is this any different from Obama’s Rev. Jeremiah Wright claiming the CIA invented AIDS to kill black men.
“Ron Paul was perfectly fine with Neo-Nazis raising money for his 2008 campaign. He went on Iranian national television to claim Israel has concentration camps where it routinely kills Palestinians.
“He admitted writing the newsletters when they came up initially, defended them, and a staffer even said he was continuing to write them. So he is either a liar or the most incompetent candidate ever. Paul is every bit as bad and as dangerous as Barack Obama.”

Ron Paul called Bradley Manning – who gave Wikileaks their data in the largest breach of US Security ever – a Hero!

Ron Paul Opposed Killing Osama Bin Laden

Ron Paul: Prostitution OK / Legalize Narcotics / Iran having Nukes is OK

Ron Paul endorsed far left candidates Ralph Nader / Cynthia McKinney for President in 2008 and 9/11 Truther Chuck Baldwin as well. – not the Republican Nominee.

Ron Paul blames America for 9/11 and gets booed.

Muslim Newspaper in Michigan endorses Ron Paul

The Republican Security Council has even more to add – this is a facebook post, so you’ll need to log in.

Ron Paul got an 80% rating from the ACLU in 2010.

65-75% rating from NARAL (for being pro-choice) from 2005-2007 – the only Republican running for President whose rating was better than an “F” from NARAL.

An “F” rating from Immigration Watchdog Groups – he opposed the border fence, called the border patrol unconstitutional and advocates amnesty in his book liberty defined.

Has one of the most isolationist voting records there is in congress regarding trade policy.

You can not possibly take this guy seriously.

Dec 122011
 

I couldn’t think of a better title. This guy is insane, inconsistent, a liar, a fraud and is like a cult leader.

I have a lot of Conservative friends that love Ron Paul – I get railed on with the “Constitution” every time I dare speak up against Ron Paul. I get sick, and it is disturbing to me that many good conservatives are getting led down the garden path by a charlatan like Ron Paul.

Before I even get in to his blatant hypocrisy and double-spoken lies I start with Ron Paul’s contempt for the greatest Republican of recent history – in 1987 Ron Paul said that the Reagan Administration was a “Dramatic Failure”. Now, Paul attempts to invoke Ronald Reagan in his ads!

Ron Paul refused to endorse John McCain in 2008 – stating that he could find nothing in common with McCain. John McCain scored 90% and 100% from the American Conservative Union in 2009/2010. Ron Paul preferred instead to endorse Cynthia McKinney – the Green Party Nominee and Ralph Nader, the far-left Attorney that was the Independent Nominee.

Ron Paul is one of the largest contradictions in political history – all the while piously pointing a finger of judgment at Mitt Romney.

The Congressman says he supports a strong national defense and emphasizes his military service, but he was an Air Force doctor. Today he wants to cut $1 trillion out of the Pentagon budget which would end all modernization and readiness programs. He would abandon NATO and abolish the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act.

He would give up America’s veto power in the UN Security Council as well as all military assistance to Israel – under the guise of stopping foreign aid. 85% of the money given to Israel is military support.

Ron Paul claims to be pro life – and attacks Mitt Romney for his record on the life issue. Problem – it was Ron Paul, not Mitt Romney that scored 65%, 75%, 65% from NARAL from 2004-2006. Romney was given a perfect 0 by Naral in his 2007-2008 Presidential bid.

While accusing other Republicans of being liars – here is part of Ron Paul’s record on the truth: Paul falsely claims – Palestinians are starving and confined to a “concentration camp”; the United States financed Osama bin Laden during the first Afghan War; the CIA is behind the sale of illegal drugs; there is an “international conspiracy” focused on the non-existent North American Union.

… and this idiot wants to be President!?

I’m not done.

Anti-Iran Resolution? – No.
Unborn Victims of Violence Act? – No
Welfare Reform in 1996? – No
Congressional Earmarks – YES! One of only 4 Republicans in 2011 to request Earmarks!
Free Trade? – No
Open Borders? – YES! Received an “F” rating from Numbers USA in 2012  – only one Republican scored worse than Ron Paul
Legalize Drugs – YES! (state’s rights, you know)
Defense of Marriage Act? – No (State’s Rights, once again)
Taxpayer Funded Abortion? – Yes! (State’s Rights)

Ron Paul believes that the 10th amendment gives him the right to vote Pro-Choice, Pro-Gay, Pro-Narcotics and grandstand as Pro-Life, Pro-family and Pro-Health!

Ron Paul is a colossal fraud. The claims that he is insane derive from the conspiracy theories he espouses from the lectern – and only a small part are relayed here.

The Coup’d’etat??? Ron Paul received an 80% rating from the ACLU in 2011.

Mr. Paul’s record is so far out of the AMERICAN mainstream that no one in the Center, Center-Right or on the Right should ever take him seriously.

Charles Munger would be proud of Ron Paul Part 3

 Charles Munger, Ron Paul  Comments Off on Charles Munger would be proud of Ron Paul Part 3
Dec 092011
 

Ron Paul would keep the pork and the gravy train coming – like any other “Moderate” Republican Charles Munger would support. However, Ron Paul is way past even the most Moderate Congress-members we’ve seen in California:

EARMARKS: He is the only GOP candidate who continues to support earmarks and pork barrel spending. When Neil Cavuto asked him about this Paul replied: “I think you’re missing the whole point. I have never voted for an earmark. I voted against all appropriation bills. So, this whole thing about earmarks is totally misunderstood.”

Earmarks are placed in appropriations bills while they are in committee. This is what Paul has always done, and then he claims to have never voted or an earmark. He votes against every appropriations bill but knows they will pass by a wide margin.

The end result is that he receives his usual $400 million in earmarks every year. In Texas he brags about these pork barrel projects, but in the presidential campaign he claims to be against earmarks. Paul is one of only four Republicans on Capitol Hill who requested earmarks in the 2011 budget.

Paul defends earmarks by saying “I don’t think they should take our money in the first place. But if they take it, I think we should ask for it back.” The earmarks he requests are a complete contradiction of his self-proclaimed “opposition to appropriations not authorized within the enumerated powers of the Constitution.”[22]

Now even “Moderate Republicans” support welfare reform – but not Ron Paul.

He has criticized welfare for decades but was one of of just four GOP Congressmen who voted against extending welfare reform in 2002. Most Americans are not fond of welfare but the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996″ was a GOP proposal signed by a reluctant Bill Clinton.

When Clinton added his signature the sign on his desk said “Welfare to Work,” and the promise came true. The act resulted in a large reduction in the number of people collecting welfare and that is why Republicans have supported its continuation.[13]

And this guy wants to be President? Oh, but wait, there’s more…

Charles Munger would be Proud of Ron Paul Part 2

 Charles Munger, Ron Paul  Comments Off on Charles Munger would be Proud of Ron Paul Part 2
Dec 072011
 

Remember Christine Todd Whitman? She is one of Munger’s all-stars and recently was advocating a third-party run by far-left “Republican” Jon Huntsman. When Pro-Life Brett Schundler won the New Jersey Governor’s Primary – Whitman refused to endorse or help him, paving the way for Jim McGreevey to be elected Governor. It is McGreevey’s mess that Chris Christie is cleaning up – and don’t forget that McGreevey had to resign after having a homosexual affair on his (Female) wife.

Hunstman is a Right-Wing Nutbag compared to Ron Paul. Hopefully, Whitman, Munger and their paid lackeys will come to their senses and get their fraud correct. Ron Paul is just that man.

The Congressman says he supports a strong national defense and emphasizes his military service, but he was an Air Force gynecologist. Today he wants to cut $1 trillion out of the Pentagon budget which would end all modernization and readiness programs. He would abandon NATO and abolish the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act.

He would give up America’s veto power in the UN Security Council as well as all military assistance to Israel. He would also ignore the major lesson from WW I and WW II, collective security. He would abandon our allies who paid 100% of the costs of Operation Desert Storm and have suffered 35% of all combat casualties in Afghanistan.[4]

The Texan says he is an advocate of free trade, but opposes practically every free trade agreement. As the Club for Growth notes, Paul “lives in a dream world if he thinks free trade will be realized absent agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA. Paul himself argues that ‘tariffs are simply taxes on consumers,’ but by opposing these trade agreements, he is actively opposing a decrease in those taxes. While Paul’s rhetoric is soundly pro-free trade, his voting record mirrors those of Congress’s worst protectionists.”[5]

Now this is a big deal, the “fat-cat” aka Country-Clubber Donors love protectionism, it is good for profits when the Government slaps tariffs on foreign goods. This is a clear case of Ron Paul getting caught.

And this is a bread-and-butter issue for the Munger/Whitman type Republican, their candidate HAS to be Pro-Choice. Ron Paul is just such a candidate:

He claims to be a right to life champion, but his plan allows abortion on the state level. He is against taxpayer funded abortions but not self paid abortions in the states’ rights category.[6]

Ron Paul also opposed the unborn victims of violence act for some bizarre “constitutional” reason.

ABORTION: He claims to be pro-life, and says Right to Life is the foundation for all rights in the Constitution. He even says “life does begin at conception.” The truth is that he is really pro-choice on the state level. That is the purpose of his Sanctity of Life Bill.

He is essentially saying it is fine to kill a baby if a state agrees. During the 2008 campaign every GOP candidate had a zero rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America, except Ron Paul. He received a 65% score in 2006, 75% in 2005 and 65% in 2004. [24]

And remember – Munger wants to raise your taxes, $7 Billion if you make more than $70K a year in California.